FED: Copenhagen Grifters Plan $3,000 Con
Would you be upset if you knew your government was about to get duped in a con that would cost your family at least $3,000 a year in new taxes? That is exactly what is happening in Copenhagen right now.
The developing world has teamed up with global warming activists in Copenhagen at the world climate conference. Together they are planning the big con. Key to the con is to play on the eco-guilt of the developed world; using it to scam cash from ‘rich countries,’ and transferring it to the developing world; all in the name of ‘ending climate change.’ The Copenhagen grifters are hoping to cash the cheques before the developing world wakes up to the con.
A leaked draft version of the agreement on the table at the Copenhagen climate conference reveals plans for a massive transfer of wealth out of Canada. This transfer will come in the form of new taxes and the establishment of a new world government body for climate change housed in the World Bank.
Lord Christopher Monckton is reported to have obtained a working copy of the draft agreement. He warns that the secretive draft version of the Copenhagen climate change treaty represents a global government power grab on an “unimaginable scale,” and mandates the creation of 700 new bureaucracies as well as a colossal raft of new taxes including 2 per cent levies on GDP and a 2 per cent tax on every international financial transaction.
The draft agreement also reportedly contains a provision for a “uniform global levy of $2 dollars per ton of CO2 for all fossil fuel emissions,” as well as an additional tax on every commercial plane journey, except ones that go in or out of poorer countries.
Of course, in addition to these various taxes, the draft agreement, reportedly pushed by President Obama, the UK and Denmark, would require auctioning of allowances to emit carbon dioxide – a cap and tax scheme. Failing to purchase permits would be met with financial penalties or outright prohibitions against such emissions.
The 2 per cent tax on GDP alone would cost Canada some $26 billion. The $2 a tonne tax would add up to $500 million per year. And the tax on international financial transactions would soak untold billions. This total tax grab is at least $26.5 billion, or over $3,000 a year for every Canadian family – not including the tax on financial transactions or plane trips.
This idea would be bad enough even if the cash was meant to stay in Canada. But it is not. The scheme is designed to send this cash to 49 developing nations for them to reduce their CO2 emissions and to create ‘so-called’ green projects. These 49 countries include the likes of Uganda, Burundi and the Sudan.
There is a perception that taxing CO2 will only hurt Canada’s west. However, CO2 emission data from Environment Canada for 2008 reveals that Alberta won’t be alone to feel the pain. While Alberta would bear 42 per cent of this burden, Ontario would have to pay for 26 per cent, due mainly to its substantial reliance on coal for electricity. Moreover, while the energy may be produced in Alberta a large percentage of Alberta’s oil and gas is consume in eastern Canada and many of those taxes will be passed along.
Further, imposing a tax on international financial transactions will place new pressures on Canada’s banks, which, so far, have survived sub-prime mortgage challenges and have weathered the global economic storm
Canadian families work too hard to see thousands of their tax dollars go from their pocket to some ‘green’ project in Sudan. The Harper government should save Canadians from this international massive tax grab.
Canada's Federal Debt
Your Share
The federal government is adding $153 million a day to our debt. At this rate, the $105-billion in debt repayment between 1997 – 2008 will be wiped out next year. Support our campaign for a federal balanced budget law and help us STOP this clock.
Spokespeople & Blog
In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.
In The News
-
Were the Olympics worth the cost?
read more » -
Coverage of the 12th Annual Teddy Waste Awards
read more » -
CTF responds to Budget 2010
read more » -
Disclosure lacking for federal stimulus
read more » -
BC Budget offers $3 billion deficit
read more » -
CTF debates ex-bureaucrats on tax hikes
read more » -
Regina dome could cost $431M
read more » -
Deficit Spending Refuted
read more » -
Thumbs Down for Manitoba Olympic Pavilion
read more » -
Alberta spends $14 M on Olympics
read more » -
CTF on the 2010 Alberta Budget
read more » -
Taxpayers Fund Walmart Shuttle
read more » -
241 Civil Servants Paid to "Volunteer" at the Olympics
read more » -
CTF shoots down tax hike suggestions
read more » -
Translink will ignore fare cheaters
read more » -
Will taxes rise in Winnipeg?
read more » -
Editorial praise for CTF federal balanced budget proposals
read more » -
STC needs record subsidy in 2010
read more » -
Winnipeg firefighters get $2M for unused sick days
read more » -
Band leaders make more than premier
read more » -
Vancouver's $50,000 politeness manual
read more » -
Taxes and fees to rise in BC
read more » -
Edmonton blows $92 million on consultants
read more » -
EI Reform
read more »





















Comments
sulada
Please get a grip <a title="güzel sözler" href="http://www.sevdigimsin.net/" target="_blank">güzel sözler</a> <a title="aşk" href="http://www.sevdigimsin.net/" target="_blank">aşk</a><a title="sevgi" href="http://www.sevdigimsin.net/" target="_blank">sevgi</a>
ali
Please get a grip. <a href="http://www.Sevdigimsin.Net"target="_blank"title="güzel sözler ">Güzel Sözler</a> If burning fossil fuels was good for the planet wouldn't we all be feeding our kids a nice glass of gasoline for breakfast every morning? The excessive CO2 levels that we are generating through our gluttonous consumption will create an environment that will not be habitable to humans - period. There is no argument only facts. And it won't destroy the planet - only us and the other animals that can't adapt.
Climate Change Rip off
This is without a doubt the biggest scam ever! These hare-brained heretics running around with doom and gloom scenarios are a bunch of idiots! The climate has always been changing and will continue to do so no matter how much money is thrown at it. You cannot change what mother nature intended to do. Let nature takes its course. To scam billions of dollars from wealthy countries will only make Canada a thrid world nation with extreme poverty.
These protesters are nothing more that a bunch of hypesters who do not have a real job nor do they have any idea the weather patterns in Canada. What are our prairie and maritime neighbours supposed to do? Turn off the heat and lights and freeze to death? Get real I say to the protesters and get a day job and quit stirring up a lot of hype none of you give a rats ass about what scams like this cost Canadian taxpayers because most of these protesters won't be contributing a red cent due to them not having a real day job. So let's quit the hype and doom and gloom the climate will change and there is nothing that can be done to fool mother nature she wil take care and heal herself in the long run just like she has done for billions of years!
Climate change grift
Thanks for getting it.
Climate change has long been a convenient pretext for all sorts of hare-brained, and usually socialist, schemes to redistribute wealth. The success of this grift depends on the ability of its proponents to con the public. Fortunately, there are some promising signs that the grift is being unmasked. Let's hope Harper is smart enough not to sign this agreement.
greengrift
Guilble is right there by grift in the dictionary
Come on people, wake up and smell the coffee that these types of articles are published as scare tatics for guilble voters to eat up. If we looked into who funded this article I bet we would find an oil company or some orther dinosaur paying the bill. Like my Grandma always said "Believe none of what you hear and half of what you see and you'll be fine in life". Look instead at the peer reviewed hardcore evidence (in science called theory) that independant researchers are finding all over the world. If you don't believe that then go see the evidence for yourself, like the expanding deserts world wide, record droughts, and ocean level and acidity rising.
What evidence do you have?
I always smile when someone immediately implicates "big oil" when someone expresses a dissenting opinion. Aside from making interesting reading, the CTF is right on with this one as a plot by socialists around the world to destroy capitalism and extract billions of dollars from hard working Canadians under the guise of saving the planet. Folks take a valium and relax. This chicken little scenario that the sky is falling from man made global warming isn't going to happen. Climate change does happen, no doubt about it, but it is caused entirely by natural occurances IE: sunspot activity, under sea volcanic eruptions, etc. Thousands of years ago before CO2 was a twinkle in Al Gore's eye, oceans ebbed and flowed. Coastal lines changed and inland lakes and rivers dried up and appeared where there were never any inland lakes. Climate change happened before the church of climatology.
Climate Change Grift
I am stunned that the Western world would buy into this. There are many dissenting opinions about the impact of CO2 on global warming, and these come from knowledgeable and well-qualified research scientists. Thanks to Al Gore, it has gone far beyond science, and is about to open a new world order of government. Canada-bashing is now the norm. Our flag is being dipped in oil and burned at Copenhagen, literally and figuratively. I am against Canada sending even one dollar outside the country as a carbon tax. But I feel the politcal backlash against Canada could be enormous. So if we have to pony up, let's go NUCLEAR. Let's replace Nanticoke's coal-powered generators with nuclear. Let's get nuclear power to supply the energy for the tar sands oil extraction!!! Then it won't be 'dirty oil' in the eyes of an ever-growing American public, bent on legislating against it.
Dissenting opinion?
Please get a grip. If burning fossil fuels was good for the planet wouldn't we all be feeding our kids a nice glass of gasoline for breakfast every morning? The excessive CO2 levels that we are generating through our gluttonous consumption will create an environment that will not be habitable to humans - period. There is no argument only facts. And it won't destroy the planet - only us and the other animals that can't adapt.
Global Warming
Of course Global Warming is real...otherwise we'd still be living in an ice age.
Yes the climate does change, but there is little man can do about it. Throwing money at the "problem" won't solve a thing.
Any angreement ouf of Copenhagen isn't about saving the planet, it's about wealth distribution. Just keep your hands out of my wallet.
Post new comment