EN FR

Ford right to battle for government employee wage restraint

Author: Jay Goldberg 2022/12/07

Ontario Premier Doug Ford and the province’s unions are in a boxing match, with the best interests of taxpayers hanging in the balance.

Ford has spent the last few years in court defending Bill 124, which was introduced to limit the growth of the wages of government employees for a three-year period to one per cent per year.

While there’s been a hot of hoopla about whether the legislation is constitutional, it’s worth remembering the original purpose of Bill 124.

The purpose of the bill was to help eliminate Ontario’s massive budget deficit.

The purpose of the bill was to ensure less debt is passed along to our children and grandchildren.

The purpose of the bill was to bring the wages of government employees, who on average earn 13.4 per cent more than their private sector counterparts, back into the realm of reality.

Bill 124 was designed to save taxpayers $9.7 billion over the course of three years and played a crucial role in the Ford government balancing the books in Ontario last year for the first time in nearly 15 years.

Those who oppose Bill 124 argue that it unfairly cuts the wages of government employees. But its opponents are wrong. The law allows for the wages of government employees to rise one per cent per year for a period of three years.

No matter what the unions say, that’s an increase, not a cut.

This wage cap was put in place in 2019, just prior to the pandemic. Just months later, tens of thousands of Ontarians lost their jobs, saw their pay cut or had their small businesses go under.

A huge swath of the province would have been incredibly grateful to have job security and modest wage growth, as government employees did.

But union bosses are far from grateful.

The unions took the government to court soon after the bill’s passage, arguing that Ford’s 2019 law was unconstitutional. Ontario Superior Court Justice Markus Koehnen sided with the unions, arguing that Bill 124 infringed on workers’ constitutional right to collective bargaining.

The Ford government plans to appeal the ruling.

Whatever the outcome of the Ford government’s appeal, the general purpose of Bill 124 must be carried forward.

The Ford government introduced Bill 124 because government employee wages were out of control. The legislation was a modest effort to help begin the process of bringing the wages of government employees in line with the wages of their private sector peers.

If Bill 124 is ultimately found to be unconstitutional, Ford needs to get tough with the unions and make it clear that government employees’ sky-high wages need to be brought back down to earth. If wage restraint needs to happen through negotiations, so be it. Regardless, government employee wages need to be brought in line with the private sector.

According to Ontario’s Financial Accountability Office, the province spent $48.2 billion on government employee wages in fiscal year 2021-22. That represents 28 per cent of total program spending in Ontario.

Government employees in Ontario make, on average, 13.4 per cent more than their private sector counterparts, according to the Fraser Institute.

If those wages were brought in line with the private sector, Ontario taxpayers would save $6.5 billion a year. That’s money that could built five new hospitals or give every Ontario taxpayer a 13 per cent income tax cut.

The big government unions have been taking advantage of Ontario taxpayers for too long. Ford was right when he said it was time to end sweetheart deals. Bill 124 was his pathway for achieving that goal.

But regardless of the vehicle, the goal of bringing government employee wages in line with reality must live on. Ford needs to spend the next four years getting tough with union bosses.


A Note for our Readers:

As you may know, we're working hard to stop Prime Minister Trudeau's attempt to add a 2nd carbon tax upon Canadian taxpayers. If you are against this tax, would you take a moment today to read and consider signing the petition below?

When you do, your name will be added to the growing list of tens of thousands across our country who want to tell the government that we are opposed to these new taxes. Please take a moment to read the petition below and consider signing it today.

To Prime Minister Justin Trudeau:

The federal government is introducing new fuel standard regulations to require industry to reduce the carbon content of fossil fuels. If industry can’t meet the standard, they’ll have to pay Trudeau's second carbon tax. This tax will ultimately hit already struggling families and businesses.

It’s bad enough that taxpayers are already paying for one carbon tax. Canadians certainly can’t afford a second carbon tax.

We, the undersigned, call on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to scrap plans for a second carbon tax.

Looks good!
Please enter your first name
Looks good!
Please enter your last name
Looks good!
Please enter a valid email address
Looks good!
Please enter a valid postal code. Ex. K1K1K1